Elecciones en
Argentina. Desde 2007, yo no voto más…
Votar en Argentina no es un derecho, es una obligación , ustedes se preguntan por qué
exponerlo así? Si hubiese posibilidad de no votar, los políticos se
quedarían muy solos. Diría que el peronismo mantendría sus pobres con votos
cautivos por alimentos, pero nada cambiaría.
Realmente nunca hubo democracia acá. Las instituciones que
deben hacer cumplir objetivos democráticos no funcionan, pero solamente lo
hacen cuando al político correspondiente le conviene.
Hay guerras de carteles, por ejemplo, cuando hay elecciones
en el sindicato de la construcción, se enfrentan con armas de fuego , porque
defienden intereses económicos. Ganar un sindicato es como ganar un cargo
vitalicio con privilegios. En el momento
que se enfrentan , las leyes no funcionan, o sea, nadie es detenido ni
procesado, porque es una guerra de compañeros.
En 2007 en Santa Fe se votó esperando un cambio luego de 24
años de peronismo. Gana un frente de partidos dirigido por el socialismo de
Rosario y apoyado por los radicales, demócratas progresistas, etc.
En cuanto asumieron tomé consciencia que habían arreglado
todo entre ellos y el peronismo para no molestarse mutuamente. Entonces nada
cambiaría.
Los peronistas de la nación apoyaron al frente para que
puedan ampliar mediante ley el número de ministerios a fin de poder generar
nuevos cargos para los amigos. Ello ocurrió mediante una ley apoyada por los
mismos peronistas que gobiernan la nación. Resultado , llenaron de cargos toda
la administración con ninguna propuesta concreta. Todos los cargos eran humo ,
no servían para nada , solo para que el funcionario se lleve un extraordinario
nivel de vida.
Desde que vi eso decidí no votar más a nadie. Por un lado
porque veo que el peronismo gana con los pobres, y por otro porque la oposición
se preocupa por su s privilegios pero no para que las cosas cambien. Para qué
quiero una democracia así??
Rápidamente comprobé que el socialismo de Rosario no es
socialismo. Es un engendro consumista que usa la figura del socialismo. La
prueba está en que el señor Binner fue expulsado del foro del socialismo en
Brasil , recientemente, junto con el socialismo de Santa Fe, por considerar que
no tienen que ver con esas ideas.
Santa Fe, sigue igual
que con los peronistas, la
educación sigue bajando el nivel, porque nadie se preocupa por ello. El
gobernador habla de buscar préstamos en el exterior para activar la economía.
Sigue con esa ridiculez del crecimiento del sistema de mercado. Me acuerdo
cuando este señor exponía sus planes para la provincia, vendiendo una imagen que no pudo sostener ni
por corto lapso.
Personalmente he expuesto proyecto para la empresa de la
energía local , lo que hizo que me ignoren tanto en uno como en otro lado.
Realmente el juego era mantener todo
igual , que nada cambie, para poder llenarse los bolsillos los nuevos
gobernantes.
http://viviendoenlarealidadconcreta.blogspot.com.ar/2012/07/es-argentina-un-pais-democratico-is.html
Elections in Argentina. From 2007, I don't vote more.
To vote in Argentina a right is not, is an obligation, do you wonder why to expose this way it? If there is possibility not to vote, the politicians would be very alone. It would say that the Peronist party would maintain its poor with captive votes for allowances, but anything would change.
Really, there was never here democracy. The institutions that should make complete democratic objectives don't work, but they only make it when the corresponding politician needs it.
There are wars of posters, for example, when there are elections in the union of the construction, they face with firearms, because they defend economic interests. To win an union is as winning a life position with privileges. In the moment that they face, the laws don't work, that is to say, nobody is stopped neither procedural, because it is a war of partners.
In 2007 in Santa Fe it was voted expecting a change after 24 years of Peronist. It wins a front of parties directed by Rosario's socialism and supported by the radicals, democratic progressive, etc.
As soon as they assumed I took conscience that they had agreed everything between them and the Peronist for not being bothered mutually. Then anything would change.
The Peronist of the nation supported to the front so that they can enlarge by means of law the number of ministries in order to be able to generate new positions for the friends. It happened it by means of a law supported by the same Peronist that govern the nation. Result, they filled with political positions the whole administration with any concrete proposal.
All the positions were smoke, they were not good for anything, alone so that the political official is taken an extraordinary level of life.
Since I saw that I decided not to vote more anybody. On one hand because I see that the Peronist win with the poor, and for other because the opposition worries about its s privileges but not so that the things change. For what reason do I want this way a democracy??
Quickly I checked that Rosario's socialism is not socialism. It is a monster consumer that uses the figure of the socialism. The test is in that Mr. Binner was expelled of the forum of the socialism in Brazil, recently, together with the socialism of Santa Fe, to consider that they don't have to do with those ideas.
Santa Fe, continues the same as with the Peronist, the education continues lowering the level, because nobody worries about her. The governor speaks of looking for overseas loans to activate the economy. It continues with that ridicule of the growth of the market system. I remember when this gentleman exposed his plans for the county, selling an image that could not sustain neither for short lapse, when assuming the government.
Personally I have exposed project for the company of the local energy, that made them to ignore me as much in one as in another side. The game was really to maintain all equal that anything changes, to be able to be filled the pockets the new rulers.
Really, there was never here democracy. The institutions that should make complete democratic objectives don't work, but they only make it when the corresponding politician needs it.
There are wars of posters, for example, when there are elections in the union of the construction, they face with firearms, because they defend economic interests. To win an union is as winning a life position with privileges. In the moment that they face, the laws don't work, that is to say, nobody is stopped neither procedural, because it is a war of partners.
In 2007 in Santa Fe it was voted expecting a change after 24 years of Peronist. It wins a front of parties directed by Rosario's socialism and supported by the radicals, democratic progressive, etc.
As soon as they assumed I took conscience that they had agreed everything between them and the Peronist for not being bothered mutually. Then anything would change.
The Peronist of the nation supported to the front so that they can enlarge by means of law the number of ministries in order to be able to generate new positions for the friends. It happened it by means of a law supported by the same Peronist that govern the nation. Result, they filled with political positions the whole administration with any concrete proposal.
All the positions were smoke, they were not good for anything, alone so that the political official is taken an extraordinary level of life.
Since I saw that I decided not to vote more anybody. On one hand because I see that the Peronist win with the poor, and for other because the opposition worries about its s privileges but not so that the things change. For what reason do I want this way a democracy??
Quickly I checked that Rosario's socialism is not socialism. It is a monster consumer that uses the figure of the socialism. The test is in that Mr. Binner was expelled of the forum of the socialism in Brazil, recently, together with the socialism of Santa Fe, to consider that they don't have to do with those ideas.
Santa Fe, continues the same as with the Peronist, the education continues lowering the level, because nobody worries about her. The governor speaks of looking for overseas loans to activate the economy. It continues with that ridicule of the growth of the market system. I remember when this gentleman exposed his plans for the county, selling an image that could not sustain neither for short lapse, when assuming the government.
Personally I have exposed project for the company of the local energy, that made them to ignore me as much in one as in another side. The game was really to maintain all equal that anything changes, to be able to be filled the pockets the new rulers.
http://viviendoenlarealidadconcreta.blogspot.com.ar/2012/07/es-argentina-un-pais-democratico-is.html
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario